NATO to examine military implications of Georgia conflict Brussels (AFP) Sept 17, 2008 NATO defence ministers are set to meet Thursday in London for talks overshadowed by Georgia's conflict with Russia and the effects it will have on the military alliance's future. "The discussion will revolve around the implications for NATO of the current security situation," NATO spokesman James Appathurai said Wednesday. "To see how NATO's on-going transformation will have to take (this) into account." The ministers, who were also to discuss Friday how the military alliance should change to meet modern security challenges, will hold a closed-doors working dinner with Georgian Prime Minister Lado Gurgenidze. The talks are likely to further anger Moscow, which described a NATO-Georgia commission meeting this week as "anti-Russia" and something that "confirmed that the reflexes of the Cold War ... were still at work in NATO." A number of NATO members -- chiefly the Baltic states and Poland -- are keen to ensure that the alliance has the heavy weaponry it needs to confront land forces, especially after Russian tanks rolled into Georgia on August 8. But NATO's recent military transformation has tended to focus on light, expeditionary forces that can be rapidly deployed to any hotspots that might flare up around the world. Appathurai acknowledged that some of the 26 NATO allies were debating "whether that needs a rebalancing, I think that is the kind of discussion that is being had in some capitals." Russia's NATO envoy said the ministers "will discuss restoring the military potential of Georgia", and insisted that the United States had already been helping Tbilisi repair its air defences. But the envoy, Ambassador Dmitry Rogozin, insisted the alliance faces a tough task, describing Georgia's military variously as "hostile but lacking in military motivation" and "deserters". "The spirit of the army is at zero level now," he said. Georgia's efforts to join the world's biggest military alliance have deeply angered Moscow, which objects to its old Cold War foe moving hardware into its backyard. But its decision to recognise the breakaway Georgian provinces of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, over which Russia sent forces into Georgia last month, saw NATO refuse to do "business as usual" and their relations have nose-dived ever since. In Tbilisi on Tuesday, NATO chief Jaap de Hoop Scheffer affirmed that Georgia's path to NATO membership was wide open and he warned Russia against interfering, as he assessed the damage from the war. "While the events of last month may have been a setback, the road to NATO is still wide open to Georgia," he said, before touring the frontline city of Gori, near where Russian troops are dug in around a buffer zone. "No other country will have a veto over that," he said in a clear reference to Russia. "Nor will we allow our strong ties with Georgia to be broken by outside military intervention or pressure." He also urged Moscow to reverse its recognition of the two regions "because it is a wrong decision." Rogozin, however, suggested that this would be out of the question. "We are not a puppet who takes a decision one moment, only to withdraw it later," he said. On Friday, the talks in London will be "dedicated to the nuts and bolts of transformation", Appathurai said, with debate on how high defence spending should be, where to find sorely-needed helicopters, and how to use NATO's flagship rapid response force. Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Analysis: Israel's predicament Geneva, Switzerland (UPI) Sep 16, 2008 Israel faces four big problems, among many others. First is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict; second, the situation with Syria; third, relations with Lebanon on its northern frontier; and fourth, its problems with Hezbollah. Among those, and when compared with the others, the conflict with the Palestinians appears to be the most clear-cut, with the desired results already known: a peaceful Palestinian state living side-by-side with its neighbors, including Israel. So why is this not happening? |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |