Meanwhile, the Kremlin has not received any Australian diplomatic note, oral or written, and neither has Russia's Nuclear Power Agency, Rosatom. And will they? If the agreement in question is heading for cancellation, both partners stand to lose a great deal. Canberra is, of course, aware of that.

The document was signed on Sept. 7, 2007, during then-President Vladimir Putin's Australian visit. Its terms and provisions are simple: Russia agrees to buy $1 billion worth of uranium every year from a country that has it in surplus (40 percent of the world's reserves). Russia also guaranteed that the uranium would remain militarily "sterile" and be used only for peaceful purposes.

A point to note: Russia's military programs are supplied in full with its own uranium ore. In its reserves Russia ranks third in the world, as is recorded in the International Atomic Energy Agency's Red Book 2008.

But back to the Australian threat to shelve the agreement. To begin with, how can that be done when there is no agreement to speak of? It seems the Australian politicians simply had no other document at hand -- could they really wave a contract for lamb supplies instead?

The agreement is strategic and looks far ahead: As planned by the contracting parties, it will kick off in 2015. The document is still not fully legitimate: Parliaments have not ratified it yet. In effect, it is a piece of chalk overlay paper with state emblems on it, text conveying mutual intentions and signatures of Putin and Australian Prime Minister John Howard.

Whether this paper will become a full-fledged international agreement is a matter for the future. And those who try to block the document today are not shouldering any risks, because the lead time is a full seven years, and the burden of responsibility will likely fall on others' shoulders.

Meanwhile, given the best-case scenario, Russian and Australian companies could start working under this agreement in 2015 -- concluding contracts, building relationships and implementing business plans. Australia, rich in uranium, could not help exciting the interest of such a nuclear heavyweight as Russia. But uranium is not like coal, which you can shovel into a furnace there and then. This ore needs technology to give it value, because only the tandem between ore and methods converts naturally occurring uranium into a fuel fit for nuclear reactors, a high-tech product. Russia, having the world's largest enrichment capacities, makes this mutual interest understandable.

Imagine an episode in which Australian companies invest in uranium workings in expectation of agreements with future Russian partners, while their own politicians come up with statements out of tune with business intentions. It is clear who stands to lose.

Rosatom is declining to comment. It says it wants no political motives affecting the nuclear branch.

Experts single out one overriding idea: All cooperation agreements, whatever the country they are concluded with, provide for mutual benefits; and if some party throws out these agreements, each of the partners suffers.

(Tatyana Sinitsyna is an RIA Novosti commentator. The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.)

(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth

del.icio.us	Digg	Reddit
YahooMyWeb	Google	Facebook

Related Links
Civil Nuclear Energy Science, Technology and News
Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com