Russian News  
Outside View: Russian arms plans -- Part 2

The RS-20 -- NATO designation SS-18 Satan.
by Andrei Kislyakov
Moscow (UPI) Jul 2, 2008
It is easy to understand why Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has said he is considering ending Russia's arms production cooperation with the former Soviet republic of Ukraine.

Ukraine's uncertain policy, its possible membership in the U.S.-led North Atlantic Treaty Organization and its anti-Russian rhetoric force Russian leadership to seek other options.

But does Russia need to hurry? The companies fulfilling Russian orders are located in eastern Ukraine, a territory whose population is set firmly against NATO membership. Without backing from this industrialized region, Ukraine is unlikely to join NATO any time in the near future.

Self-reliance on armaments is a good thing, but partnership is necessary, too. Should the Russian government sever industrial cooperation on cruise missiles, we might lose contracts for the production of components for RS-20 -- NATO designation SS-18 Satan -- strategic intercontinental ballistic missiles as well. For the RS-20 ICBMs are the linchpin of Russia's nuclear deterrence. Russian-Ukrainian Sea Launch space cooperation and much else could suffer.

Forget for a moment that the Russian government needs to produce a full range of weapons in specific quantities and of specific quality. Is Russia's defense industry ready to take such a step?

In June, Mikhail Babich, deputy chairman of the defense committee of the State Duma, the lower and main chamber of the Russian Parliament, said: "One-third of our defense plants are in the red or are about to go bankrupt. Another third are barely making ends meet. And only one third are doing moderately well."

Speaking of lead times, Babich said frankly that "production of modern fourth and fifth generation weapons and military equipment sometimes takes several years, and unless we solve these problems, any business planning, investment, or retooling is out of the question."

Indeed, it may be said that Babich was optimistic when he mentioned "several years." Pantsyr-S1 and S-400 surface-to-air missile systems designed to repel space attacks show that at least 10 years might be needed.

Russian Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov made a similar remark about the Pantsyr's lead time. Speaking at the end of March in Tula, he said the developer, Tula's Instrument-Making Design Bureau, had repeatedly pushed back its deadlines. The reason, he said, was its failure "to establish sound relations with its suppliers and co-producers."

Maybe Russia should not hasten to sever relations with its Ukrainian manufacturers, especially since international experience shows us the advantages of multinational cooperation in weapons production.

(Andrei Kislyakov is a political commentator for RIA Novosti. This article is reprinted by permission of RIA Novosti. The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.)

(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com

Outside View: Russian arms plans -- Part 1
Moscow (UPI) Jul 2, 2008
Military-technical cooperation with the West and with other nations: does Russia need it? Although sounding rhetorical, the question highlights one of the current weaknesses of Russia's defense industry.







  • Bush, Sarkozy fought fiercely at last G8: Abe
  • Walker's World: France has nowhere to go
  • Britain backs French ambitions on European defence
  • Far Eastern Patriot Games

  • US to consult allies before commenting on Iran nuclear response
  • North Korea nuclear process at 'pivotal point': US
  • Iran says any attack on its nuclear sites means war
  • Russia slams US nuclear disarmament proposals: report

  • Analysis: Revolt in India rebel group ULFA
  • Analysis: India mulls new probe agency
  • Analysis: India eyes fake currency flow
  • Process On For Establishing Aerospace Command

  • Analysis: Controlling Tibet -- Part 2
  • Revenge blast in China injures 12: state media
  • Shanghai knifing toll rises as sixth policeman dies: reports
  • Chinese picnic over, Germany teddy maker says: report

  • Biofuel waste becomes valuable chemicals
  • EU ministers 'discover' biofuels not an obligation after all
  • Difficult to replace Iranian oil output, says OPEC: report
  • Analysis: Nigeria seeks international help

  • NASA plans two ISS spacewalks next week
  • Shuttle astronauts bid farewell to space station crew
  • Discovery undocks from ISS
  • Shuttle Astronauts Bid Farewell To Space Station Crew

  • LockMart Begins Critical Test Phase For First Advanced EHF MilComms Satellite
  • Air Force Strives To Enhance Communications Networks
  • Raytheon Achieves UK Intelligence Integration Milestone
  • SeaMobile Awarded Contract With United States General Services Administration

  • US wanted to test sarin on Australian troops: report
  • Raytheon Solipsys Releases 3-D Visualization Tool
  • Lockheed Martin EQ-36 Counterfire Target Acquisition Radar Completes CDR
  • Vumii Gives Security Operators Ability To Visually Assess Targets Detected By Radar

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement