Russian News  
The Iranian Nuclear Deadlock Going Nowhere Fast Part One

disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only
by Pyotr Goncharov
Moscow (UPI) April 28, 2008
The latest meeting in Shanghai of the six international mediators in the Iranian nuclear issue has been a fiasco, as is suggested by the meager news reports.

The participating countries, the five permanent U.N. Security Council members plus Germany, again failed to find common ground. What happened?

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the Republican front-runner in the U.S. presidential race, could have caught a glimpse of what was happening at that meeting behind closed doors.

In an interview this week with ABC News, McCain emphasized his belief in the decisive role of tough sanctions in resolving the problem of Iran's nuclear program. He favors tough sanctions against the Islamic republic to force it to halt its uranium enrichment program -- which has not only aroused international concerns, but made the world doubt it might be for purely peaceful purposes as Iran claims. The senator said the sanctions up until now have never been sufficiently tough, as the Russians blocked all efforts of Washington and the European Union in the Security Council.

McCain's position in favor of toughening sanctions against Iran is not news. Moreover, for some reason he clearly echoed the ideas considered by Russian and U.S. experts on Iranian nuclear problems who met in Moscow on April 14 as part of the Luxembourg Forum.

One of the ideas voiced in Moscow was that we should either recognize Iran as a nuclear state, that is, a state that has nuclear weapons, or opt for tough sanctions, possibly complete isolation. The arguments the experts used to prove their point were also very similar to what McCain said: The Iranian economy is weak, despite the inflow of petrodollars, because it is 40 percent dependent on foreign refineries and is therefore very vulnerable to economic sanctions.

Admittedly, along with discussing sanctions, the Moscow meeting also focused on investments that could be attractive for Iran and other encouragement options. That approach is contrary to McCain's position. The participants in the six-party talks do not see eye to eye on the appropriate ratio of punishment and encouragement. Therefore, the key reason why their latest meeting was a fiasco was their failure to work out a stick and carrot policy that would suit everyone.

The Russian side was possibly to blame, which McCain faithfully pointed out by saying that the Russians blocked all efforts.

In fact, the senator was right. The Russian Foreign Ministry said before the meeting that the talks should focus on developing new "positive" proposals for Iran this time.

Next: Future directions for the talks

(Pyotr Goncharov is a political commentator for RIA Novosti. This article was originally published by RIA Novosti. The opinions expressed in this article are the author's alone.)

(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com

Outside View: Iran's nuclear fuel stalled
Moscow (UPI) pril 25, 2008
Azerbaijani customs officials have been keeping a single Russian trailer -- which they describe as a truck convoy -- carrying absolutely safe heat-insulating equipment for Iran's Bushehr nuclear power plant at the Astara checkpoint on the Azerbaijani-Iranian border since March 29.







  • China, India powers to equal US might in 10 years: Canadian survey
  • Gates urges greater clarity by military media analysts
  • Atlantic Eye: Tbilisi's European yearnings
  • US forces chief in Japan says China's military intent unclear

  • US calls for fresh approach to nuclear sanctions
  • The Iranian Nuclear Deadlock Going Nowhere Fast Part One
  • How To Have A Nuclear War Without The Bomb Going Off
  • Congress Angry Over Syrian Intel Delays As Assad Denies Nuke Plans

  • Analysis: India eyes fake currency flow
  • Process On For Establishing Aerospace Command
  • Cisco plans to turn India into global hub, triple workforce
  • India's Biotech Baby Elephant

  • China warns of housing price spikes in second quarter
  • Tibet an 'international issue,' Japan PM tells China
  • US: We want Tibet situation to improve
  • China's economic growth slows as food prices soar

  • Analysis: Turkmenistan opens up
  • US secretary concedes biofuels may spur food price rises
  • BP, Santelisa Vale, And Maeda Unveil Plans To Invest In Biofuels
  • White Is The New Black Gone Green...When It Comes To Roofs

  • Expedition 16's Whitson Hands Over Command Of Station
  • NASA Awards Space Station Water Contract To Hamilton Sundstrand
  • Russia Needs Billions More To Complete It's ISS Segment
  • Russia to call for extending ISS use

  • BAE To Develop Military Communications Network
  • 3rd SOPS Makes Historic WGS Transition
  • Lockheed Martin Opens Wireless Cyber Security Lab
  • Northrop Grumman Team Bids To Bring Order To Missile Defense

  • LockMart Completes Initial EMI Testing To Enhance JLTV Design
  • Raytheon Awarded Contract For European Radar Program
  • Outside View: Su-34 strategy -- Part 2
  • BAE Starts Manufacture Of First F-35 Lightning II Aircraft

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement